REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE
KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.
FOUNDERS
RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)
According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media. ID R30-03156
PUBLISHER
Liburkina L. M.
SITE SECTIONS
Main page
Editorial staff
Editorial policy
Annotated catalogue (2011)
Annotated catalogue (2012)
Annotated catalogue (2013)
Annotated catalogue (2014)
Annotated catalogue (2015)
Annotated catalogue (2016)
Annotated catalogue (2017)
Annotated catalogue (2018)
Annotated catalogue (2019)
Annotated catalogue (2020)
Annotated catalogue (2021)
Annotated catalogue (2022)
Annotated catalogue (2023)
Annotated catalogue (2024)
Annotated catalogue (2025)
Thematic sections of the journal
Proceedings of scientific conferences
|
 Social Cohesion Policy: Conceptions and Their Adaptation in Modern Context Slukin H. I.
Slukin, Heorhii I. (2025) “Social Cohesion Policy: Conceptions and Their Adaptation in Modern Context.” Business Inform 6:29–39. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2025-6-29-39
Section: Economic Theory
Article is written in UkrainianDownloads/views: 0 | Download article (pdf) -  |
UDC 338.2:332.1
Abstract: The article examines the evolution of the definition of the category of «social cohesion», as well as modern approaches to managing and monitoring social cohesion in the context of the network economy with the aim of preventing the risks of de-solidarization. The aim of the research is to conduct a systematic analysis of the conceptual foundations of cohesion policy in the European Union and Ukraine, and to determine the directions for their further adaptation to the challenges and opportunities of the modern network economy. The influence of inclusive political and economic institutions, various types of social capital (bonding, bridging, linking), and social networks on the formation of unity within and between communities has been analyzed. This underscores the relevance of social cohesion issues as a characteristic of networks – a fundamental resource, a source of economic opportunities, and an important condition for the sustainability of economic development. Three levels of cohesion management have been identified: strategic, institutional-financial, and operational. The multi-level model ensures the achievement of integrated goals – growth, access to social rights, support for vulnerable groups, and adherence to basic standards. Cohesion policy is a tool for achieving socioeconomic convergence by overcoming territorial disparities through investment in infrastructure, support for employment, and expansion of access to services. In the context of a network economy, it is necessary to adapt social cohesion policy to prevent risks of social fragmentation that threaten internal stability and resilience of development and can lead to the disintegration of the socioeconomic system. At the same time, building trust, engaging human capital, and reducing transaction costs depend on cohesion and impact economic dynamics. A critical review of current monitoring systems for cohesion policy in the EU and Ukraine revealed a concentration on quantitative and infrastructural indicators that reflect the implementation of projects and the volume of services provided, but do not encompass the qualitative aspects of social interaction, trust, and integration. To enhance analytical capabilities, it is recommended to supplement the monitoring system with indicators of digital inclusion, horizontal social connections, institutional and interpersonal trust, citizen participation in decision-making, and the integration of vulnerable groups into social interaction networks. The expanded system will enable a transition from technocratic accounting to a comprehensive analysis of social cohesion as a prerequisite for sustainable regional development. A promising direction for further research is assessing the relationship between the level of social cohesion and the rates of economic growth in order to improve the efficiency of the socioeconomic policy as a whole.
Keywords: social cohesion, cohesion policy, sustainable development, network economy, cohesion indicators, inclusion, inclusive institutions, regional development.
Tabl.: 2. Bibl.: 36.
Slukin Heorhii I. – Postgraduate Student, Department of Economic Cybernetics and Applied Economics, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (4 Svobody Square, Kharkіv, 61022, Ukraine) Email: [email protected]
List of references in article
“Global Risks Report 2021: Executive summary and key findings“. World Economic Forum, 2021. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2021.pdf
“Global Risks Report 2022: Executive summary and key findings“. World Economic Forum, 2022. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2022/digest/
“Global Risks Report 2023: Executive summary and key findings“. World Economic Forum, 2023. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2023/digest/
“Global Risks Report 2024: Executive summary and key findings“. World Economic Forum, 2024. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2024/digest/
Durkheim, E. Le suicide: etude de sociologie. Paris: F. Alcan, 1897.
Durkheim, E. Le suicide: etude de sociologie, vol. II. Paris: F. Alcan, 1897.
Durkheim, E. The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press, 1893.
Acemoglu, D., and Robinson, J. A. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishers, 2012.
Tiutiunnykova, S. V., and Berveno, O. V. “Sotsialna zhurtovanist suspilstva yak faktor pidvyshchennia yakosti zhyttia v umovakh chetvertoi promyslovoi revoliutsii“ [Social Cohesion of Society as a Factor in Improving the Quality of Life in the Conditions of the Fourth Industrial Revolution]. Ekonomichna teoriia ta pravo, no. 4 (2019): 46-64. DOI: 10.31359/2411-5584-2019-39-4-46
Putnam, R. D. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2001.
Cooley, C. H. “Primary groups“. In Social organization: A study of the larger mind, 23-31. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1909.
Granovetter, M. S. “The strength of weak ties“. American Journal of Sociology. 1973. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392
Woolcock, M., and Narayan, D. “Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy“. The World Bank Research Observer, vol. 15, no. 2 (2000): 225-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225
Jenson, J. Defining and Measuring Social Cohesion. London: Commonwealth Secretariat, 2010.
Easterly, W., Ritzen, J., and Woolcock, M. “Social Cohesion, Institutions, and Growth“. Economics & Politics, vol. 18, no. 2 (2006): 103-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2006.00165.x
Social and Solidarity Economy: Beyond the Fringe. London: Zed Books, 2015.
“New directions in social policy: Alternatives from and for the Global South“. Geneva : UNRISD, 2016-2018. https://www.unrisd.org/en/activities/events/new-directions-in-social-policy-alternatives-from-and-for-the-global-south-global-research-workshop
Hujo, K., and Yi, I. Social policy and poverty: A synthesis of findings. Geneva: UNRISD, 2016.
“Overcoming Inequalities in a Fractured World: Between Elite Power and Social Mobilization“. Geneva : UNRISD, 2018. https://geneva.fes.de/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/2018/Booklet---UNRISD-Conference-2018.pdf
The Social Economy of Poverty and Social Capital. Geneva: UNRISD, 2019.
“A New Eco-Social Contract: Vital to Deliver the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development“. Geneva : UNRISD, 2021. https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/2021-07/UNRISD%20-%20A%20New%20Eco-Social%20Contract.pdf
Between Fault Lines and Front Lines: Shifting Power in an Unequal World. Bloomsbury Academic, 2022.
Crisis Responses to Crises: Institutional Change and Social Protection after COVID-19. Geneva: UNRISD, 2023.
Petrunko, O. V. Molod ta innovatsiini tekhnolohii: perspektyvy i ryzyky vzaiemodii [Youth and Innovative Technologies: Prospects and Risks of Interaction]. Kirovohrad, 2013.
Henriksen, L. F., Seabrooke, L., and Young, K. “Intellectual rivalry in American economics: Intergenerational social cohesion and the rise of the Chicago school“. Socio-Economic Review, vol. 20, no. 3 (2022): 989-1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwac024
Filippini, R. et al. “Social Networks as Drivers for Technology Adoption: A Study from a Rural Mountain Area in Italy“. Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 22 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229392
Kyzym, M. O., Khaustova, V. Ye., and Trushkina, N. V. “Merezheva ekonomika: evoliutsiia rozvytku, peredumovy stanovlennia kontseptsii, kontseptualni pidkhody do vyznachennia“ [Network Economy: Evolution of Development, Prerequisites for the Formation of the Conception, Conceptual Approaches to the Definition]. Biznes Inform, no. 11 (2022): 40-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2022-11-40-51
Status Report on European Telework: Telework 1997. European Commission Report. Luxembourg, 1997.
Aiello, L. M., Joglekar, S., and Quercia, D. “Multidimensional Tie Strength and Economic Development“. Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1 (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26245-4
“Cohesion policy - Where has it come from? Where is it going?“ Medium. June 03, 2022. https://euauditors.medium.com/cohesion-policy-where-has-it-come-from-where-is-it-going-79aa681dd583
“Social cohesion“. European Migration Network. https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/networks/european-migration-network-emn/emn-asylum-and-migration-glossary/glossary/social-cohesion_en
“Economic, social and territorial cohesion“. European Parliament. 2023. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/93/economic-social-and-territorial-cohesion
“Cohesion policy indicators“. Eurostat. 2024. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Cohesion_policy_indicators
[Legal Act of Ukraine] (2014). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/385-2014-п#Text
[Legal Act of Ukraine] (2020). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/695-2020-п#Text
“Pokaznyky monitorynhu dosiahnennia tsilei Derzhavnoi stratehii rehionalnoho rozvytku na 2021-2027 roky. Dodatok 2 do Stratehii“ [Indicators for Monitoring the Achievement of the Goals of the State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021-2027. Appendix 2 to the Strategy]. Kyiv, 2020. https://www.minregion.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/dodatok-2.pdf
|
FOR AUTHORS
License Contract
Conditions of Publication
Article Requirements
Regulations on Peer-Reviewing
Publication Contract
Current Issue
Frequently asked questions
INFORMATION
The Plan of Scientific Conferences
OUR PARTNERS
Journal «The Problems of Economy»
|