REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE

KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.

 FOUNDERS

RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)

According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media.
ID R30-03156

 PUBLISHER

Liburkina L. M.

 SITE SECTIONS

Main page

Editorial staff

Editorial policy

Annotated catalogue (2011)

Annotated catalogue (2012)

Annotated catalogue (2013)

Annotated catalogue (2014)

Annotated catalogue (2015)

Annotated catalogue (2016)

Annotated catalogue (2017)

Annotated catalogue (2018)

Annotated catalogue (2019)

Annotated catalogue (2020)

Annotated catalogue (2021)

Annotated catalogue (2022)

Annotated catalogue (2023)

Annotated catalogue (2024)

Thematic sections of the journal

Proceedings of scientific conferences

The Innovative Capability of Enterprises: the Methodical Provisions for Analysis and Evaluation
Kuzmin O. Y., Zhyhalo O. Y.

Kuzmin, Oleh Ye., and Zhyhalo, Oksana Yu. (2020) “The Innovative Capability of Enterprises: the Methodical Provisions for Analysis and Evaluation.” Business Inform 3:59–66.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2020-3-59-66

Section: Innovative Processes

UDC 658.012.32:658.589

Abstract:
The article considers the capability of enterprise as a complex of its implicit capabilities, which exist in the plane of the technologies used, equipment, knowledge, skills and aptitudes of employees. With reference to the essential content of the concept, the article defines that the innovative capability of enterprises cannot be measured only by component content indicators (concentration, area, mass) or functional variables that have a correlation with component characteristics. To evaluate and analyze the capability of the enterprise, the article identifies two groups of methods: 1) related to the study of individual components of capability, namely: information, resource, budget and debt, financial capability and capability of premises (warehouses) of the enterprise; 2) providing a comprehensive evaluation of the capability of enterprises, for which it is possible to use the AHR model (analytical hierarchical model), to develop a deployed chain of enterprise development, to apply an ANP model (model of analytical network process) or to provide a comprehensive analysis of both the enterprise’s capability and the demand. The article proposes recommendations on the formation of a method of evaluating the innovative capability of enterprise. In particular, in order to improve the performance of evaluation processes, the enterprise should ensure the following: credibility of the evaluation process, which is determined by the use of additional evaluation criteria, consistency indicators, etc.; operational efficiency; multicriteriality and hierarchiality of the evaluation process, which is possible by forming a system of indicators (hierarchy), identifying their criterion values, methods of generalization, etc.; completeness of the evaluation process, which arises from the use of quantitative and qualitative indicators, the integration of indicators with different levels of aggregation; simplicity, clarity, unity of evaluation requirements; economic efficiency.

Keywords: capability, innovation activity, enterprise, evaluation, analysis, methodical approaches.

Tabl.: 1. Formulae: 8. Bibl.: 15.

Kuzmin Oleh Ye. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Director, Scientific-Educational Institute of Economics and Management of the Lviv Polytechnic National University (5 Mytropolyta Andreia Str., Lviv, 79013, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Zhyhalo Oksana Yu. – Postgraduate Student, Department of Enterprise Economics and Investment, Lviv Polytechnic National University (12 Stepana Bandery Str., Lvіv, 79013, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]

List of references in article

Malikov, O. B. Opredeleniye parametrov mekhanizirovannykh skladov shtuchnykh gruzov [Determination of the Parameters of Mechanized Warehouses of Piece Cargo]. Leningrad: LIIZhT, 1989.
Grinevich, G. P. Kompleksnaya mekhanizatsiya i avtomatizatsiya pogruzochno-razgruzochnykh rabot na zheleznodorozhnom transporte [Complex Mechanization and Automation of Loading and Unloading Operations in Railway Transport]. Moscow: Transport, 1981.
Temchenko, H. “Shliakhy znyzhennia resursoiemnosti produktsii promyslovykh pidpryiemstv“ [The Ways of Reduction of Resource Using the Production of Industrial Enterprises]. Ekonomichnyi analiz. 2010. https://econa.at.ua/Vypusk_7/temchenko.pdf
Seheda, I. V. “Osoblyvosti ta kryterii parametryzatsii vykorystannia pryrodno-resursnykh kompleksiv“ [Features and Parameterization Criteria Using Naturall-Resource Complexes]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. 2015. http://vestnik-econom.mgu.od.ua/journal/2015/12-2015/35.pdf
Barun, M. V. “Resursoiemnist vyrobnytstva yak uzahalniuiuchyi pokaznyk efektyvnosti vykorystannia resursiv pidpryiemstva“ [Resource Intensity of Production as a Generalizing Indicator of Efficiency of Use of Resources of the Enterprise]. Kommunalnoye khozyaystvo gorodov. 2009. https://core.ac.uk/reader/11322923
Lozovskyi, O. M., and Horshkov, M. A. “Pryntsypy formuvannia ta stratehiia realizatsii mekhanizmu upravlinnia protsesamy vidtvorennia resursnoho potentsialu ahrarnoho sektoru ekonomiky“ [Principles and Strategy Formation Mechanism of Reproduction Management Resource Potential Agricultural Sector of the Economy]. Ekonomika: realii chasu. 2017. https://economics.opu.ua/files/archive/2017/No2/64.pdf
“Pochemu koeffitsient ispolzovaniya resursov tak vazhen dlya otsenki rentabelnosti“ [Why Resource Utilization is so Important in Evaluating Profitability]. https://www.wrike.com/ru/blog/pochemu-koeffitsient-ispolzovaniya-resursov-tak-vazhen-dlya-otsenki-rentabelnosti
Kondratiuk, S. Ya., and Dziubenko, L. M. “Paradyhma biudzhetnoi yemnosti“ [Paradigm of the Budget Capacity]. Ekonomika pidpryiemstva: teoriia i praktyka. 2014. https://core.ac.uk/reader/32610517
Paradissopoulos, I. K. “Railway Management: An Evaluation of Management Cybernetics in a Public Enterprise : PhD Thesis“. 1989. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/139374.pdf
Wang, Y., Zhu, Z., and Ma, Z. “Eco-efficiency evaluation of petrochemical enterprises: An application of 3D state-space model“. Energy Science & Engineering. 2018. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.205
Chen, Z.-H., and Zhou, Z.-J. “Research on the Evaluation Index System for Patent Financing Capacity of High-tech Enterprises“. Proceedings of the 2018 4th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2018). Series : Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR). https://doi.org/10.2991/icsshe-18.2018.159
Wang, T., Xin, B. Ch., and Qin, L. J. “AHP-Based Capacity Evaluation of Enterprise Development“. Procedia Engineering. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.878
Humble, J., and Farley, D. Continuous Delivery: Reliable Software Releases Through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation. AddisonWesley Professional, 2010.
Zhang, H., and Zhou, B. “The Research on Evaluation of Technological Innovation Capability Based on ANP“. International Conference on Management Science and Engineering. 2007. http://www.seidatacollection.com/upload/product/201001/1264474043g0gz7icg.pdf
Turner, P. “An evaluation of an enterprise framework for performance improvement in the emergency department of a rural district general hospital : PhD Thesis“. University of Lincoln, 2016. http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/id/eprint/23724/1/23724%20An%20Evaluation%20of%20an%20Enterprise%20Framework%20for%20Performance%20Improvement%20in.pdf

 FOR AUTHORS

License Contract

Conditions of Publication

Article Requirements

Regulations on Peer-Reviewing

Publication Contract

Current Issue

Frequently asked questions

 INFORMATION

The Plan of Scientific Conferences

 OUR PARTNERS

Journal «The Problems of Economy»