УКР ENG

Search:


Email:  
Password:  

 REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE

KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.

 FOUNDERS

RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS of Ukraine (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)

ROR

EDRPOU 05481984

According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media.
ID R30-03156

 PUBLISHER

Liburkina L. M.

 CATALOG

Annotated catalogue (2011)
Annotated catalogue (2012)
Annotated catalogue (2013)
Annotated catalogue (2014)
Annotated catalogue (2015)
Annotated catalogue (2016)
Annotated catalogue (2017)
Annotated catalogue (2018)
Annotated catalogue (2019)
Annotated catalogue (2020)
Annotated catalogue (2021)
Annotated catalogue (2022)
Annotated catalogue (2023)
Annotated catalogue (2024)
Annotated catalogue (2025)
Annotated catalogue (2026)
Thematic sections of the journal
Proceedings of scientific conferences


A Сomparative Analysis of Digital Transformation Management Frameworks and a Context-Fit Selection Matrix
Herman Y. Y., Mazorenko O. V.

Herman, Yaroslav Ye., and Mazorenko, Oksana V. (2026) “A Сomparative Analysis of Digital Transformation Management Frameworks and a Context-Fit Selection Matrix.” Business Inform 3:560–570.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2026-3-560-570

Section: Management and Marketing

Article is written in English
Downloads/views: 0

Download article (pdf) -

UDC 005.591.6:004.9

Abstract:
Digital transformation is increasingly understood as enterprise-wide change in value creation, operating arrangements, and organisational capabilities, not simply technology adoption. The aim of the article is to provide a comparative analysis of widely used digital transformation frameworks (Gartner, McKinsey 7S, BCG, Deloitte, MIT, Cognizant) and to develop an instrument that supports an evidence-based choice of a framework depending on the conditions and needs of a particular organisation. The study is conducted as a qualitative comparative synthesis: the material is drawn from recent academic publications and authoritative practitioner descriptions, and the comparison is performed using shared criteria that ensure a consistent basis for analysing models of different types. The main result is the conclusion that the examined frameworks differ primarily in managerial logic and focus: some emphasise coherence among organisational elements, whereas others emphasise phased change and maturity assessment, coordination of change across domains, the development of digital capabilities and leadership, or the modernisation of the technological foundation as a condition for scaling. On this basis, a selection matrix is proposed that links typical organisational manifestations and constraints to an appropriate framework and specifies which additional components should be incorporated for more comprehensive transformation management. The study is limited by the predominance of secondary sources; further work should test the proposed instrument on empirical material and refine suitability criteria for different industries and maturity levels. The practical significance lies in improving the quality of managerial decisions regarding the selection and combination of frameworks, supporting more coherent planning, better controllability of change, and higher effectiveness of digital initiatives. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the systematic comparison of frameworks of different origins on a shared set of criteria and in formalising the results in the form of an applied selection instrument.

Keywords: digital transformation; digital transformation frameworks; digital maturity; strategic management; management frameworks; organisational alignment.

Tabl.: 4. Bibl.: 22.

Herman Yaroslav Ye. – Postgraduate Student, Department of Management, Business and Administration, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics (9a Nauky Ave., Kharkiv, 61166, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Mazorenko Oksana V. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Management, Business and Administration, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics (9a Nauky Ave., Kharkiv, 61166, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]

List of references in article

Abouaomar S. & Alhaderi K. (2024). Overcoming Barriers to Digital Transformation in Public Organizations using the McKinsey 7S Model. International Journal of Research in Economics and Finance, 3(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.71420/ijref.v1i3.23
Attah R. U., Garba B. M. P., Gil-Ozoudeh I. & Iwuanyanwu O. (2024). Strategic frameworks for digital transformation across logistics and energy sectors: Bridging technology with business strategy. Open Access Research Journal of Science and Technology, 2(12), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.53022/oarjst.2024.12.2.0142
Boston Consulting Group. Digital Maturity. https://www.bcg.com/capabilities/digital-technology-data/digital-maturity
Chandratreya D. A. (2024). Digital Transformation Strategy and Management. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, 10(08). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem38058
Chavarnakul T., Bi Zh. & Dhiman G. (2025). A Systematic Literature Review on Resilient Digital Transformation, Examining How Organizations Sustain Digital Capabilities. HighTech and Innovation Journal, 2(6), 687–722. https://doi.org/10.28991/hij-2025-06-02-021
Cognizant. (2025). AI’s two-year timeline: The path to meeting the legacy modernization mandate. https://www.cognizant.com/us/en/insights/insights-blog/legacy-modernization-mandate-ai-timeline
Cui C. (2025). Enterprise Management Digital Transformation: A Strategic Framework for SMEs. Journal of World Economy, 4(4), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.56397/jwe.2025.08.05
Deloitte. (2024). Digital transformation survey (Digital strategy & innovation). https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/digital-transformation/digitaltransformation-survey.html
Domniku M. & Ahmeti M. (2024). Digital Transformation and its Influence on Modern Business Strategies. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences (PJLSS), 2(22), 11559–11571. https://doi.org/10.57239/pjlss-2024-22.2.00872
Elhameed A. T. A. (2025). Factors Determining Digital Transformation Framework in Egypt: IT Industry: Insistence on Customer Centricity. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, II(13), 788–810. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.66910
Fernandez-Vidal J., Perotti F. A., Gonzalez R. & Gasco J. (2022). Managing digital transformation: The view from the top. Journal of Business Research, 152, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.020
Fischer M., Imgrund F., Janiesch Ch. & Winkelmann A. (2020). Strategy archetypes for digital transformation: Defining meta objectives using business process management. Information & Management, 5(57), Art. 103262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103262
Imbar R. V., Supangkat S. H., Langi A. Z. R. & Arman A. A. (2022). Digital Transformation Framework: A Review. 2022 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS). Bandung, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1109/iciss55894.2022.9915169
Mathur P. & Jarris A. (2023). Becoming data champions: New research reveals five keys to data maturity and AI innovation. Google Cloud. https://cloud.google.com/transform/data-champions-digital-maturity-five-keys-bcg-research
Musahid F. N., Fawzi F. S. & Maghfuriyah A. (2024). Digital Transformation: A Strategic Imperative for Modern Enterprises. Journal of Economics, Assets, and Evaluation, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.47134/jeae.v2i1.456
Nguyen T. & Dang L. T. T. (2024). Evaluating digital transformation preparedness among Vietnamese enterprises. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science – Economics and Business Administration, 3(15), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.46223/hcmcoujs.econ.en.15.3.3349.2025
Reiter M. (2024). Comparative Analysis of the Top Frameworks of Digital Transformation. Marketing Identity Human vs. Artificial (pp. 601–611). Trnava. https://doi.org/10.34135/mmidentity-2024-60
Saarikko T., Westergren U. H. & Blomquist T. (2020). Digital transformation: Five recommendations for the digitally conscious firm. Business Horizons, 6, 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.07.005
Spremic M., Zentner H. & Zentner R. (2022). Measuring Digital Business Models Maturity: Theory, Framework, and Empirical Validation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 6553–6567. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2022.3226864
Verhoef P. C., Broekhuizen T. & Bart Ya. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
World Bank Group (2021). A Global Study on Digital Capabilities. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/959181623060169420/pdf/A-Global-Study-on-Digital-Capabilities.pdf
Zimnoch D. (2021). Digital Transformation of Transportation in the Age of COVID-19. Problemy Zarz?dzania – Management Issues, 93(3), 100–121. https://doi.org/10.7172/1644-9584.93.5

 FOR AUTHORS

License Contract

Conditions of Publication

Article Requirements

Regulations on Peer-Reviewing

Current Issue

Frequently asked questions

 INFORMATION

Main page

Editorial staff

Editorial policy

About the Journal

Aim and Scope

AI AND GENERATIVE AI TOOLS POLICY

Announcements and news

The Plan of Scientific Conferences

Indexing

 OUR PARTNERS

Journal «The Problems of Economy»

  © Business Inform, 1992 - 2026 The site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY-SA. Write to webmaster