УКР ENG

Search:


Email:  
Password:  

 REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE

KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.

 FOUNDERS

RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS of Ukraine (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)

ROR

EDRPOU 05481984

According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media.
ID R30-03156

 PUBLISHER

Liburkina L. M.

 CATALOG

Annotated catalogue (2011)
Annotated catalogue (2012)
Annotated catalogue (2013)
Annotated catalogue (2014)
Annotated catalogue (2015)
Annotated catalogue (2016)
Annotated catalogue (2017)
Annotated catalogue (2018)
Annotated catalogue (2019)
Annotated catalogue (2020)
Annotated catalogue (2021)
Annotated catalogue (2022)
Annotated catalogue (2023)
Annotated catalogue (2024)
Annotated catalogue (2025)
Annotated catalogue (2026)
Thematic sections of the journal
Proceedings of scientific conferences


Identification and Ranking of Critical Infrastructure Elements of Territorial Communities of Ukraine
Khaustova V. Y., Kotliarov Y. I., Trushkina N. V.

Khaustova, Viktoriia Ye., Kotliarov, Yevhen I., and Trushkina, Nataliia V. (2026) “Identification and Ranking of Critical Infrastructure Elements of Territorial Communities of Ukraine.” Business Inform 4:155–172.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2026-4-155-172

Section: Regional Economy

Article is written in Ukrainian
Downloads/views: 4

Download article (pdf) -

UDC 332.1:351.862

Abstract:
The article substantiates the theoretical and methodological foundations for identifying and ranking elements of critical infrastructure of territorial communities of Ukraine under modern security, socioeconomic, and wartime challenges. It is proved that in conditions of the ongoing full-scale war, increasing hybrid threats, energy instability, cyber risks, and the need for postwar recovery, critical infrastructure acquires a decisive importance for ensuring the livelihood of the population, continuity of basic services, maintaining territorial resilience, and providing local security. It has been found that traditional approaches to defining critical infrastructure, primarily focused on the sectoral or nationwide level, do not adequately consider the local specifics of the functioning of territorial communities, the level of infrastructure dependence of the population, territorial vulnerability, and the characteristics of the modern security environment. It is substantiated that the modern transformation of approaches to understanding critical infrastructure is characterized by a shift from an object-oriented model to service-oriented, systemic, and resilience-based approaches, within which criticality is defined not only by the significance of an individual infrastructure object but also by its role in ensuring the continuity of essential services, maintaining the functioning of socioeconomic systems, and the capacity of territories for adaptation and recovery. The feasibility of using localized criticality as an adapted approach to assessing the importance of infrastructure elements at the level of territorial communities has been demonstrated. An authorial approach to the identification of critical infrastructure elements in territorial communities has been proposed, which combines systemic, risk-oriented, service-oriented, and resilience-based approaches. A classification of critical infrastructure elements into essential, strategically important, and supportive has been developed. A system of criteria for identifying elements of critical infrastructure of territorial communities has been developed, taking into account functional significance, the level of infrastructure dependence of the population, territorial accessibility, security risks, intersectoral interdependence, redundancy, and recoverability. Within the scope of the study, a matrix for assessing the localized criticality of infrastructure elements and a model for classifying critical infrastructure elements according to the population’s dependence on them and territorial substitutability were proposed. The practical significance of the obtained results lies in the possibility of using the proposed approach by local governments, military administrations, and critical infrastructure management entities during the preparation of territorial community development strategies, resilience and continuity plans, postwar recovery programs, civil protection systems, the formation of local critical infrastructure registries, and prioritization of infrastructure projects.

Keywords: regional economy; spatial development; critical infrastructure; territorial communities; identification of critical infrastructure elements; localized criticality; territorial resilience; infrastructural stability; vital services; territorial vulnerability; infrastructure security; civil protection; postwar recovery; strategic community development planning.

Fig.: 2. Tabl.: 5. Bibl.: 34.

Khaustova Viktoriia Ye. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Director, Research Centre for Industrial Problems of Development of NAS of Ukraine (2 floor 1-a Inzhenernyi Ln., Kharkiv, 61166, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Kotliarov Yevhen I. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Head of, Sector of Energy Security and Energy Saving of the Department of Industrial Policy and Energy Security, Research Centre for Industrial Problems of Development of NAS of Ukraine (2 floor 1-a Inzhenernyi Ln., Kharkiv, 61166, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Trushkina Nataliia V. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Senior Research Fellow, Senior Research Fellow, Sector of Industrial Policy and Innovative Development of the Department of Industrial Policy and Energy Security, Research Centre for Industrial Problems of Development of NAS of Ukraine (2 floor 1-a Inzhenernyi Ln., Kharkiv, 61166, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]

List of references in article

Biringer B., Vugrin E. & Warren D. (2013). Critical Infrastructure System Security and Resiliency. (1st ed). Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b14566
Biriukov D. S. & Kondratov S. I. (2012). Zakhyst krytychnoi infrastruktury: problemy ta perspektyvy vprovadzhennia v Ukraini. Analitychna dopovid [Protection of critical infrastructure: problems and prospects of implementation in Ukraine. Analytical report]. Kyiv: NISD.
Bobro D. H. (2016). Udoskonalennia metodolohii ranzhuvannia obiektiv krytychnoi infrastruktury ta yikh vidnesennia do krytychnoi infrastruktury: analit. zapyska [Improvement of the methodology for ranking critical infrastructure objects and their assignment to critical infrastructure: analyt. note]. Kyiv: NISD.
Cedergren A., Johansson J. & Hassel H. (2018). Challenges to critical infrastructure resilience in an institutionally fragmented setting. Safety Science, Vol. 110. Part C, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.025
Curt C. & Tacnet J.-M. (2018). Resilience of Critical Infrastructures: Review and Analysis of Current Approaches. Risk Analysis, Iss. 11(Vol. 38), 2441–2458. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13166
Fekete A. (2019). Critical infrastructure and flood resilience: Cascading effects beyond water. WIREs Water, Iss. 5(Vol. 6), Art. e1370. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1370
Fekete A., Lauwe P. & Geier W. (2012). Risk management goals and identification of critical infrastructures. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Iss. 4(Vol. 8), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2012.050108
Galvan G. & Agarwal J. (2018). Community Detection in Action: Identification of Critical Elements in Infrastructure Networks. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Iss. 1(Vol. 24). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000400
Khaustova V. Ye. & Trushkina N. V. (2025). Pravovi zasady rehuliuvannia rozvytku krytychnoi infrastruktury: mizhnarodna praktyka ta ukrainskyi dosvid [Legal principles of regulating the development of critical infrastructure: international practice and Ukrainian experience]. Biznes Inform, № 11, 6–26. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2025-11-6-26
Khaustova V. Ye. & Trushkina N. V. (2025). Teoretychni pidkhody do sutnosti poniattia «krytychna infrastruktura»: mizhnarodnyi, prostorovyi i rezylientnisnyi vymiry [Theoretical approaches to the essence of the concept of "critical infrastructure": international, spatial and resiliency dimensions]. Problemy ekonomiky, № 4, 336–351. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2025-4-336-351
Khaustova V. Ye., Trushkina N. V. & Pronoza P. V. (2025). Identyfikatsiia elementiv krytychnoi infrastruktury: zakordonnyi i vitchyznianyi dosvid [Identification of critical infrastructure elements: foreign and domestic experience]. Biznes Inform, № 8, 47–71. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2025-8-47-71
Korchenko A. O., Kozachok V. A. & Hizun A. I. (2015). Metod otsinky rivnia krytychnosti dlia system upravlinnia kryzovymy sytuatsiiamy [Method for assessing the level of criticality for crisis management systems]. Zakhyst informatsii, № 1(T. 17), 86–98. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Zi_2015_17_1_14
Kyzym M. O., Kotliarov Ye. I. & Kolbasin Ye. S. (2023). Orhanizatsiia tsentralizovanoho teplopostachannia v okremykh naselenykh punktakh i napriamy formuvannia rehyonalnykh rynkiv teploenerhii [Organization of centralized heat supply in individual settlements and directions of forming regional heating energy markets]. Biznes Inform, № 11, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2023-11-109-118
Leitner B., Rehak D. & Kersys R. (2018). The new procedure for identification of infrastructure elements significance in sub-sector railway transport. Communications – Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, Iss. 2(Vol. 20), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.26552/com.C.2018.2.41-48
Melnychuk O. V. (2019). Identyfikatsiia obiektiv krytychnoi infrastruktury: bazovi metody ta kryterii [Identification of critical infrastructure objects: basic methods and criteria]. Rehionalna polityka: istoriia, polityko-pravovi zasady, urbanistyka, prostorove planuvannia, arkhitektura: zb. nauk. pr.: u 2 ch [Regional policy: history, political and legal foundations, urbanism, spatial planning, architecture: collection of scientific papers: in 2 parts] (pp. 193–197). Kyiv; Ternopil: Beskydy. https://repositary.knuba.edu.ua/items/9ba87866-ea4b-4f32-9995-dc6c4885fe41
Mottahedi A., Sereshki F., Ataei M., Qarahasanlou A. N. & Barabadi A. (2021). The Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review. Energies, Iss. 6(Vol. 14), Art. 1571. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061571
Novotny P. & Janosikova M. (2020). Designating Regional Elements System in a Critical Infrastructure System in the Context of the Czech Republic. Systems, Iss. 2(Vol. 8), Art. 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems8020013
OECD Publishing (2014). Boosting Resilience through Innovative Risk Governance. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264209114-en
OECD Publishing (2019). Good Governance for Critical Infrastructure Resilience. OECD Reviews of Risk Management Policies. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/02f0e5a0-en
Official Journal of the European Union. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on the resilience of critical entities and repealing Council Directive 2008/114/EC (Text with EEA relevance). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2557/oj
Pescaroli G., Wicks R.T., Giacomello G. & Alexander D.E. (2018). Increasing resilience to cascading events: The M.OR.D.OR. scenario. Safety Science, Vol. 110. Part C, 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.012
Pidiukov P. P. & Kalynovskyi O. V. (2020). Systema derzhavnoho zakhystu krytychnoi infrastruktury Ukrainy: heneza, suchasnyi stan i perspektyvy optymizuvannia v umovakh podalshoho zabezpechennia natsionalnoi bezpeky krainy [The system of state protection of critical infrastructure of Ukraine: genesis, current state and prospects of optimization in the conditions of further ensuring the national security of the country]. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava, № 4, 355–359. https://doi.org/10.36695/2219-5521.4.2020.63
Pursiainen C. & Kytomaa E. (2022). From European critical infrastructure protection to the resilience of European critical entities: what does it mean?. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, Iss. S1(Vol. 8), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2022.2128562
Rehak D., Senovsky P. & Slivkova S. (2018). Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Elements and Its Main Factors. Systems, Iss. 2(Vol. 6), Art. 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems6020021
Rehak D., Senovsky P., Hromada M. & Lovecek T. (2019). Complex approach to assessing resilience of critical infrastructure elements. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Vol. 25, 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2019.03.003
Rinaldi S. M., Peerenboom J. P. & Kelly T. K. (2001). Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, No. 6(Vol. 21), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/37.969131
Shcherbak L. M., Hnatiuk S. O., Sydorenko V. M. & Shakhoval O. A. (2017). Metod vyznachennia rivnia vazhlyvosti obiektiv krytychnoi informatsiinoi infrastruktury v haluzi tsyvilnoi aviatsii [Method for determining the level of importance of critical information infrastructure objects in the field of civil aviation]. Bezpeka informatsii, № 1, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.18372/2225-5036.23.11565
Telenyk S. S. (2018). Krytychna infrastruktura yak obiekt administratyvno-pravovoho rehuliuvannia [Critical infrastructure as an object of administrative and legal regulation]. Yurydychnyi chasopys Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav, № 1, 179–189. https://lawjournal.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/%D0%AE%D1%87%D0%9D%D0%90%D0%92%D0%A1_2018_%D0%A2%D0%BE%D0%BC%208,%20%E2%84%961_179-189.pdf
Vasylius V., Jonaitis A., Gudzius S. & Kopustinskas V. (2021). Multi-period optimal power flow for identification of critical elements in a country scale high voltage power grid. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 216, Art. 107959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107959
Vidrikova D. & Boc K. (2014). Identification of the security environment influences on renewable energy sources and critical infrastructure elements of Euroregion Beskydy. Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 1001, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1001.80
World Bank (2025). Ukraine. Fourth Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA4). February 2022 – December 2024. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/96bd9c94-c327-49b4-8aff-fe125686f04e/content
Yaremenko O. I. & Strakhnitskyi Ya. O. (2022). Teoretychni pidkhody do vyznachennia definitsii krytychnoi infrastruktury yak obiektu derzhavnoho upravlinnia [Theoretical approaches to defining the definition of critical infrastructure as an object of state management]. Publichne upravlinnia ta mytne administruvannia, № 1, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.32836/2310-9653-2022-1.13
Yermenchuk O. P. (2018). Osnovni pidkhody do orhanizatsii zakhystu krytychnoi infrastruktury v krainakh Yevropy: dosvid dlia Ukrainy: monohrafiia [Main approaches to the organization of critical infrastructure protection in European countries: experience for Ukraine: monograph]. Dnipro: Dnipropetrovskyi derzhavnyi unyversytet vnutrishnikh sprav.

 FOR AUTHORS

License Contract

Conditions of Publication

Article Requirements

Regulations on Peer-Reviewing

Current Issue

Frequently asked questions

 INFORMATION

Main page

Editorial staff

Editorial policy

About the Journal

Aim and Scope

AI AND GENERATIVE AI TOOLS POLICY

Announcements and news

The Plan of Scientific Conferences

Indexing

 OUR PARTNERS

Journal «The Problems of Economy»

  © Business Inform, 1992 - 2026 The site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY-SA. Write to webmaster