BUSINESS INFORM JOURNAL.

УКР

ENG

Search:

REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE

KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.

FOUNDERS

RESEARCH CENTER FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS of Ukraine (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)

ROR

EDRPOU 05481984

According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media.
ID R30-03156

PUBLISHER

Liburkina L. M.

CATALOG

A Differentiated Approach to Selecting the Financial Recovery Mechanism for Enterprises
Farynovych I. V., Palasevych M. B.

Farynovych, Iryna V., and Palasevych, Mykola B. (2026) “A Differentiated Approach to Selecting the Financial Recovery Mechanism for Enterprises.” Business Inform 7:517–526.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2026-7-517-526

Section: Finance, Money Circulation and Credit

Article is written in Ukrainian
Downloads/views: 0

Download article (pdf) -

UDC 658.168+ 658.15

Abstract:
This study examines the theoretical and methodological foundations for selecting enterprise financial recovery mechanisms in the context of increasing financial distress and an unstable economic environment. The characteristic features of the main types of corporate financial crises, namely profitability crisis, liquidity crisis, and solvency crisis, are systematized. The article proposes a classification of enterprise solvency conditions, distinguishing preserved solvency, impaired solvency, and critical insolvency according to an enterprise’s ability to meet its financial obligations to creditors in a timely and full manner. The study substantiates the need for a differentiated approach to selecting financial recovery mechanisms based on the type of financial crisis, the enterprise’s solvency condition, and its strategic development priorities. An algorithm for selecting enterprise financial recovery mechanisms is developed, relying on a comprehensive assessment of the type of financial crisis, solvency condition, and strategic priorities. The proposed algorithm includes the stages of initial financial diagnosis, identification of the type of financial crisis, assessment of solvency, and determination of the strategic priority for selecting preventive, stabilization, or rehabilitation mechanisms. Furthermore, a set of managerial instruments and measures is defined for each mechanism, and the necessity of repeated assessment of key financial indicators is substantiated to determine the enterprise’s subsequent development path, including transition to financial stabilization or the initiation of bankruptcy and liquidation procedures. The proposed algorithm provides a logical and consistent framework for managerial decision-making and enables a differentiated selection of financial recovery mechanisms according to the enterprise’s financial condition. This approach enhances the soundness of anti-crisis management and improves the prospects for restoring long-term financial stability. The practical significance of the research lies in the applicability of the proposed algorithm for enterprise managers, financial managers, consultants, and other anti-crisis management practitioners in diagnosing the financial condition of enterprises, selecting appropriate financial recovery mechanisms, and designing financial rehabilitation programs. The proposed approach contributes to more efficient managerial decision-making, timely restoration of solvency, strengthening of financial resilience, and the sustainable long-term development of enterprises.

Keywords: financial recovery of enterprises; financial crisis; solvency; preventive mechanism; stabilization mechanism; financial rehabilitation; rehabilitation mechanism; selection algorithm.

Fig.: 3. Tabl.: 1. Bibl.: 17.

Farynovych Iryna V. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Department of Finance, Scientific-Educational Institute of Economics and Management of the Lviv Polytechnic National University (5 Mytropolyta Andreia Str., Lviv, 79013, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Palasevych Mykola B. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics and Economics, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University (24 Ivana Franka Str., Drohobych, 82100, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]

List of references in article

Bondarchuk M., Voloshyn O., Vivchar O. & Dzhuryk K. (2022). The development of methodology evaluation financial revenues in territorial communities. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 4, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.4.45.2022.3820
Hrynchyshyn Ya. M. (2018). Finansova kryza pidpryiemstva yak obiekt antykryzovoho upravlinnia [Financial crisis of the enterprise as an object of anti-crisis management]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia «Ekonomichni nauky». https://ej.journal.kspu.edu/index.php/ej/uk/article/view/349/346
Khmurova V. V. & Levytskyi R. V. (2021). Diahnostyka finansovoi kryzy kompanii yak mira zapobihannia neplatospromozhnosti [Diagnostics of the company's financial crisis as a measure of insolvency prevention]. Naukovyi visnyk Poltavskoho universytetu ekonomiky i torhivli. Seriia «Ekonomichni nauky», 2, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.37734/2409-6873-2021-2-5
Koh S. K., Durand R. B., Dai L. & Chang M. (2015). Financial distress: Lifecycle and corporate restructuring. Journal of Corporate Finance, 33, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.04.004
Kopyliuk O. I. & Muzychka O. M. (2022). Orhanizatsiino-finansovyi mekhanizm antykryzovoho upravlinnia diialnistiu subiektiv hospodariuvannia [Organizational and financial mechanism of anti-crisis management of business entities' activity]. Universytetski naukovi zapysky, 1–2, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.37491/UNZ.85-86.1
Lashchyk I. I. (2023). Financial rehabilitation of the enterprise: theoretical and practical aspects. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia». Seriia «Ekonomika», 28, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.25264/2311-5149-2023-28(56)-31-37
Naichuk-Khrushch M. B. & Shchur T. I. (2025). Systematyzatsiia instrumentiv antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom: teoretychnyi i prykladnyi aspekty [Systematization of enterprise anti-crisis management tools: theoretical and applied aspects]. Biznes Inform, 6, 392–400. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2025-6-392-400
Pohrishchuk H. B. & Prysiazhniuk S. V. (2016). Identyfikatsiia finansovoi kryzy na pidpryiemstvi [Identification of the financial crisis at the enterprise]. Ekonomika i suspilstvo. https://economyandsociety.in.ua/journals/3_ukr/80.pdf
Rico M. & Puig F. (2019). Successful turnarounds in bankrupt firms? Assessing retrenchment in the most severe form of crisis. BRQ Business Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2019.06.002
Schweizer L. & Nienhaus A. (2017). Corporate distress and turnaround: Integrating the literature and directing future research. Business Research, 10, 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-016-0041-8
Sereda A. V. (2024). Osoblyvosti diahnostyky kryzovykh staniv pidpryiemstva v myrnyi chas ta v umovakh viiny [Features of diagnostics of enterprise crisis states in peacetime and under war conditions]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, 69. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-69-65
Shchomisiachni opytuvannia pidpryiemstv Ukrainy, cherven 2026 roku. Natsionalnyi bank Ukrainy. (2026, July 1). Biznes zberih pozytyvni otsinky rezultativ svoiei diialnosti – pidsumky opytuvannia pidpryiemstv u chervni [Business maintained positive assessments of its performance results – results of the enterprise survey in June]. https://bank.gov.ua/ua/news/all/biznes-zberig-pozitivni-otsinki-rezultativ-svoyeyi-diyalnosti--pidsumki-opituvannya-pidpriyemstv-u-chervni
Tereshchenko O. O. & Pavlovskyi S. V. (2016). Udoskonalennia finansovoho mekhanizmu antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom [Improvement of the financial mechanism of enterprise anti-crisis management]. Finansy Ukrainy. https://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Fu_2016_6_9
Tomchuk O. F. (2023). Analiz platizhnoi spromozhnosti pidpryiemstva ta vidobrazhennia yii v obliku: sutnist, klasyfikatsiia, otsinka [Analysis of enterprise solvency and its reflection in accounting: essence, classification, assessment]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, 51. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-51-16
Vovchak O., Kulyniak I., Halkiv L., Pavlyshyn M. & Horbenko T. (2021). Udoskonalennia diahnostyky kryzy na pidpryiemstvi: finansovo-ekonomichnyi zriz [Improvement of crisis diagnostics at the enterprise: financial and economic slice]. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 3, 292–303. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v3i38.237459
Yermolenko O. A., Kokovikhina O. O. & Lysonkova N. M. (2024). Finansova sanatsiia yak sposib zapobihannia bankrutstvu pidpryiemstv v umovakh voiennoho stanu [Financial rehabilitation as a way to prevent enterprise bankruptcy under martial law]. Ekonomichnyi prostir, 190, 114–117. https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/190-21
Zhou Y., Zhu Y. & Shi Y. (2026). Which is better for distressed firms: Comparison between bankruptcy reorganization and major asset restructuring. International Review of Law and Economics, 86, Art. 106335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2026.106335