BUSINESS INFORM JOURNAL.

УКР

ENG

Search:

REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE

KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.

FOUNDERS

RESEARCH CENTER FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS of Ukraine (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)

ROR

EDRPOU 05481984

According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media.
ID R30-03156

PUBLISHER

Liburkina L. M.

CATALOG

Genesis and Evolution of Economic Diagnostics of Construction Development Enterprises: The Industry-Specific Imperatives of the Integrative Paradigm
Ratnikov D. H., Fesun A. S., Shyliuk P. P., Petrenko O. V.

Ratnikov, Dmytro H. et al. (2026) “Genesis and Evolution of Economic Diagnostics of Construction Development Enterprises: The Industry-Specific Imperatives of the Integrative Paradigm.” Business Inform 8:193–202.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2026-8-193-202

Section: Economics of Construction

Article is written in Ukrainian
Downloads/views: 2

Download article (pdf) -

UDC 005.52:338.45:69

Abstract:
In the scientific literature, economic diagnostics of enterprises has developed predominantly within comprehensive, integral, system-dynamic, portfolio, and adaptive approaches; however, their methodological integration in the context of construction development remains insufficiently elaborated. The distinctions between comprehensiveness, integrality, and integrativeness in diagnostics remain conceptually blurred, while the corporate, project, portfolio, and ecosystem levels are generally analyzed separately. The aim of the article is to provide a theoretical and methodological substantiation of the genesis and paradigmatic evolution of economic diagnostics and to identify the industry-specific imperatives for the transition towards integrative diagnostics of construction development enterprises. To achieve this aim, the study employs methods of theoretical generalization, comparative, structural-logical, and cause-and-effect analysis, synthesis, and conceptual modeling. The sequence of diagnostic paradigm development is defined: from deviation control and financial-economic assessment to comprehensive, integral, system-dynamic, and integrative diagnostics. The distinctions are clarified between comprehensive diagnostics as the completeness of subject coverage, integral diagnostics as the mathematical aggregation of indicators, and integrative diagnostics as the identification of structural, temporal, cause-and-effect, and inter-organizational interdependencies. A multilevel framework of «enterprise – project – portfolio – stakeholder ecosystem» is substantiated, within which diagnostics covers not only the state and dynamics of the system, but also systemic imbalances, critical constraints, risk transmission channels, economic capability, and the feasibility reserve. Integrative diagnostics is proposed as a meta-level framework combining previous diagnostic paradigms, shifting the unit of diagnostic cognition from an individual indicator to a configuration of interrelated parameters and from resource potential to the system’s ability to meet its obligations and adaptively reconfigure itself. The practical value of the proposed approach lies in enabling the early identification of critical imbalances, assessment of the economic feasibility of the project portfolio, and substantiation of decisions concerning financing, resource provision, and reconfiguration of the development system.

Keywords: economic diagnostics; development; enterprise; digital transformation; investment and construction project; competitiveness; business process; sustainable development.

Tabl.: 1. Formulae: 1. Bibl.: 15.

Ratnikov Dmytro H. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Candidate on Doctor Degree, Department of Construction Management, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture (31 Povitrianykh Syl Ave., Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Fesun Artem S. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Candidate on Doctor Degree, Department of Management in Construction, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture (31 Povitrianykh Syl Ave., Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Shyliuk Petro P. – Postgraduate Student, Department of Construction Management, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture (31 Povitrianykh Syl Ave., Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Petrenko Oleksandr V. – Postgraduate Student, Department of Construction Management, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture (31 Povitrianykh Syl Ave., Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]

List of references in article

Akselrod R., Shpakov A., Ryzhakova G., Honcharenko T., Chupryna I. & Shpakova H. (2022). Integration of data flows of the construction project life cycle to create a digital enterprise based on building information modeling. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 1, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.46338/ijetae0122_05
Bilgin G., Dikmen I., Birgonul M. T. & Ozorhon B. (2023). A decision support system for project portfolio management in construction companies. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 2(22), 705–735. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622022500821
Chih Y.-Y., Hsiao C. Y.-L., Zolghadr A. & Naderpajouh N. (2022). Resilience of organizations in the construction industry in the face of COVID-19 disturbances: dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2(38). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001014
Ghanbari M., Olaikhan A. A. J. & Skitmore M. (2025). Enhancing project portfolio selection for construction holding firms: a multi-objective optimization framework with risk analysis. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 8(32), 5534–5557. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2023-0532
Kostenko D. V. & Storozhuk O. V. (2024). Vyznachennia kliuchovykh ekonomichnykh pokaznykiv ta tsyfrovykh metryk dlia upravlinnia portfelem proiektiv [Determination of key economic indicators and digital metrics for project portfolio management]. Shliakhy pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti budivnytstva v umovakh formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn, 54 (2), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2024.54(2).308-315
Kulikov P., Ryzhakova G., Ryzhakov D., Malykhina O. & Honcharenko T. (2020). OLAP-tools for the formation of connected and diversified production and project management systems. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 5(9), 8670–8676. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/1108102020
Long W., Bao Z., Chen K., Ng S. T. & Wuni I. Y. (2024). Developing an integrative framework for digital twin applications in the building construction industry: a systematic literature review. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 59, Art. 102346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.102346
Onikiienko N. V., Petrukha N. M. & Ryzhakova H. M. (2023). Naukovo-prykladni komponenty polikryterialnoi systemy otsinky innovatsiinoho rozvytku pidpryiemstv: imperatyvy vzaiemodii intehrovanykh struktur [Scientific and applied components of the multi-criteria system for evaluating the innovative development of enterprises: imperatives of the interaction of integrated structures]. Shliakhy pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti budivnytstva v umovakh formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn, 52 (1), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2023.52(1).261-273
Pradana D. W. & Ekowati D. (2024). Future organizational resilience capability structure: a systematic review, trend and future research directions. Management Research Review, 10(47), 1586–1605. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-08-2023-0538
Romanenko O. V. (2025). Teoretychne obgruntuvannia ta rozrobka poniatiinoho aparatu «adapto-variatyvnoi omnirezylientnosti» budivelnoi developerskoi kompanii [Theoretical substantiation and development of the conceptual apparatus of "adapto-variational omniresilience" of a construction development company]. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. Seriia: Ekonomika, 26, 86–92. https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-0366/2025.26.8
Rotov O. O. (2026). Ekonomichna diahnostyka innovatsiinoho rozvytku pidpryiemstv budivelnoho developmentu v intehrovanomu proiektnomu seredovyshchi [Economic diagnostics of innovative development of construction development enterprises in an integrated project environment]. Formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn v Ukraini, 2 (297), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.66416/2522-1620.2.2026.71-77
Ryzhakova H. M., Prykhodko D. O., Predun K. M., Luhina T. S. & Koval T. S. (2017). Modeli tsilovoho vyboru reprezentatyvnykh indykatoriv diialnosti budivelnykh pidpryiemstv: etymolohiia ta typolohiia system diahnostyky [Models of targeted selection of representative indicators of construction enterprises' activity: etymology and typology of diagnostic systems]. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system. https://repositary.knuba.edu.ua/items/9145e2e5-1f13-4c5b-ba0a-f43528623a39
Teece D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 1(51), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Tekletsion B. F., Gomes J. F. D. S. & Tefera B. (2024). Organizational resilience as paradox management: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 1(32), Art. e12495. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12495
Wijayarathne N., Gunawan I. & Schultmann F. (2024). Dynamic capabilities in digital transformation: a systematic review of their role in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 11(150), Art. 03124008. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15055